Quartz - It's often said that of all the published scientific research on climate change, 97% of the papers conclude that global warming is real, problematic for the planet, and has been exacerbated by human activity.
Katharine Hayhoe, an atmospheric scientist at Texas Tech University, worked with a team of researchers to look at the 38 papers published in peer-reviewed journals in the last decade that denied anthropogenic global warming.
"Every single one of those analyses had an error-in their assumptions, methodology, or analysis-that, when corrected, brought their results into line with the scientific consensus," Hayhoe wrote in a Facebook post.
One of Hayhoe's co-authors, Rasmus Benestad, an atmospheric scientist at the Norwegian Meteorological Institute, built the program using the computer language R-which conveniently works on all computer platforms-to replicate each of the papers' results and to try to understand how they reached their conclusions. Benestad's program found that none of the papers had results that were replicable, at least not with generally accepted science.