TTU Home Communications & Marketing Home Texas Tech Today

Researchers' Romneycare Results Published in Journal

The only experiment in the country to predict the outcome of Obama's health care reform was not successful.

Written by Leslie Cranford

The basic idea of both Romneycare and Obamacare is to get people out of emergency rooms, and into primary care.

The basic idea of both Romneycare and Obamacare is to get people out of emergency rooms and into primary care.

With the U.S. Supreme Court decision looming on the fate of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) – informally known as Obamacare – two Texas Tech University researchers and a former colleague have published research that shows a similar plan implemented by Mitt Romney in Massachusetts did not work well for hospital productivity in the short term.

“Mandatory Insurance Coverage and Hospital Productivity in Massachusetts: Bending the Curve?” co-authored by Mark Thompson, associate professor; Timothy Huerta, assistant professor and director of the Center for Health Innovation, Education, and Research; and Eric Ford, Forsythe Medical Center Distinguished Professor of Health Care, at the University of North Carolina at Greensboro, is now available online, published ahead of print as a PDF in Health Care Management Review.

Several years ago it was decided the state of Massachusetts was going to provide insurance for every citizen. Huerta said the basic idea of both Romneycare and Obamacare is to get people out of emergency rooms, and into primary care. Their health can be better managed, there would be lower total costs in the health care system, and that will stem the increased cost in health care.

“What we found was that in the years immediately after implementation – we looked at 2005-2008 – was that hospitals became much less efficient for years in Massachusetts,” Huerta said.

Huerta said the point of the research was to assess if mandatory health insurance in Massachusetts led to increases in its hospitals'  productivity, compared to the rest of the U.S.

Huerta said the point of the research was to assess if mandatory health insurance in Massachusetts led to increases in its hospitals’ productivity, compared to the rest of the U.S.

“There are lots of ways of looking at the results, but the productivity of hospitals – in other words, the numbers of patients they see for the resources they put into the system (outputs divided by inputs) – what those figures told us was that, relative to the rest of the U.S., Massachusetts hospitals saw a decline in productivity.”

Huerta said the point of the research was to assess if mandatory health insurance in Massachusetts led to increases in its hospitals’ productivity, compared to the rest of the U.S.

“It’s really the only experiment we have to look at to see what would happen if everyone in the U.S. had health insurance.” Huerta explains.

“It’s believed that having everyone in a common pool means that the total cost per person will be lower. That’s spreading the cost among a larger group of people. When more people have insurance, they’re more likely to see the doctor. So you would expect that preventative care would prevail and that you’d be able to catch things before they become costly. The theory about having a health care system where everybody is covered is that you’re ‘bending the cost curve.’”

That bent curve, Huerta said, makes reference to the fact that the cost of health care grows faster than the growth of the economy. Last year health care cost grew at 6 percent.

“If that’s the assumption, then we have an experiment in Massachusetts,” Huerta said, “so our idea was to see how Massachusetts fared when they started this program, against all the other hospitals in the U.S.

For the study, researchers used the American Hospital Association’s annual survey and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services’ case mix index for fiscal years 2005 through 2008. That formula included 2,967 hospitals for the U.S. minus 51 hospitals from Massachusetts, for a total of 2,916 hospitals.

“This study is one of the first to examine the argument often made by policymakers that mandating insurance coverage will slow health care costs,” Thompson said.

In 2005, Massachusetts had 69 general medicine facilities and the U.S. had 4,856. Therefore 73 percent of eligible hospitals in Massachusetts provided complete data compared to 59 percent in the rest of the U.S.

At least in the early stages, the numbers showed Massachusetts coverage mandates led to a significant drop in hospitals’ productivity relative to comparable facilities in other states. In 2008, Massachusetts functioned 3.53 percent below its 2005 level, whereas facilities across the U.S. saw a 4.06 percent increase over the same time period.

Researchers concluded that if the individual mandate is implemented nationwide, the Massachusetts experience indicates that in a near term, a decrease in overall hospital productivity will occur. As such, current cost estimates of the PPACA legislation’s impact on overall health spending are potentially understated.

“So our argument is, not that it’s the end of the world, but that the reorganization of the health care system has a productivity cost,” Huerta said. “If what happened in Massachusetts happens on a national scale, we should expect hospitals to be less productive in the near term. And we don’t know what’s going to happen in the long term. We have no idea because the data doesn’t go out that far.

“It’s this idea that when this is put into place, people immediately expect results. And it’s worse because the instant results they’ll see are negative results. Of course you’re going to hear all sorts of negative things. But we don’t know if it’s a short-term cost for a long-term gain.”

FacebookTwitterLinkedInGoogle GmailTumblrGoogle+RedditShare


One Response to “Researchers' Romneycare Results Published in Journal”

  1. Warren Nelson '72' Says:

    I’ve taken on the task of reading this Act but have only read 974 pages so far. The thing that stands out to me is at the core of the legislation and that is that it requires the filing of a tax return to be a participant in any way. The latest US Census says there are some 311 million people in the country. In IRS Publication 6292 it says 237 million people filed tax returns in 2011. To me it’s logical to assume that the 74 million Americans who don’t file tax returns would be the uninsured and also not eligible for Obamacare due to it’s tax return filing requirement. If the goal of the legislation is to lessen the load in emergency rooms and provide for the stated 30 million uninsured as well as lowering the costs, it is designed to be irrelevant to the problems from the start. I have asked my congressman John Culberson, readers of the Wall Street Journal Opinion section and the editors of AARP magazine to enlighten me on this subject as “experts” on the legislation to no avail. As someone who is studying the legislation and it’s effect, what is going to keep the 74 million out of the emergency rooms? The “Mandate” will only cover the 237 million who file tax returns. Thanks

Leave a Reply

Rawls College of Business
Business Administration Building

The Rawls College of Business accounts for about 25 percent of Texas Tech graduates.

The college has a full-time teaching staff of roughly 100 in five departments: accounting, finance, information systems and quantitative science, management and marketing.

The college offers an accredited weekend MBA for Working Professionals program.

Dedicated to connecting students, alumni and employers, the Career Management Center assists Rawls College students with their transition to the world-of-work, and supplies prospective employers with top-notch candidates, ready to make an immediate contribution.

Connect with the Rawls College of Business on .

Related

Chinese Meditation Prompts Double Positive Punch in Brain White Matter

Forensic Science Student Applies New Technique to Research

Students Inspire Artwork on New Wind Turbines